January 27, 2007

A Small Inconsistency

Dr. X posts this from Trent Lott's porch:

"The Washington Post has an article about the do-it-yourself recovery underway in the wake of the execrable Federal response to Hurricane Katrina. It is by turns heartening ("the waves of volunteers typically come down for a week or two, work during the day and at night sleep on cots and bunks set up in places such as the old school library and huts on the community's football field")...

"...maddening ("the two-by-fours inside the walls of George and Margaret Ladner's new home are inscribed with biblical verses, each written by one of the Alabama schoolchildren who raised money to buy the lumber")...

"...and infuriating ("the reason for the charity's dominant role in the rebuilding is that little, if any, of the $3.2 billion in federal aid for Mississippi homeowners has reached anyone here").

"Perhaps this vindicates the arguments some conservatives have made that handouts make people weaker, that significant direct aid to distressed populations is a recipe for profiteering and undermines genuine progress. Perhaps this proves that the best thing to do is to trust people to lift themselves up by their bootstraps and figure it out for themselves. Perhaps the conservatives have been right about this all along.

"Now maybe we should try it in Iraq."

1 Comments:

Blogger JAB said...

In the conservative world, the significant government aid is slated for the wholly undistressed populations of the upper class.

One important thing about Iraq. You rarely hear the economic argument, but there was a relentless drive by the Administration to privatize a resource-based socialist economy.

This was the height of ideologically-driven policy, tossing everyone in the country into packs-of-street-dogs capitalism.

Into that Costco Cheerios box of grave errors, vanities, and stupidities (Honey-Nut errors, vanities and stupidities, I'll wager) this was among the nuttiest. Imagine what would happen in PARIS if we suddenly threw everyone into Russia-style capitalism by force.

In and of itself iy may have driven the population away from support for the occupation.

January 28, 2007 at 10:52 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home