July 16, 2005

A Poem to the World's Richest Man

Mrs. Gates didn't know when William popped out
that he would go on to be a Harvard dropout.
But even so he makes the big bucks
convincing corporate tools to buy software that sucks.
Now his wonderful growth has started to stall,
and he can't find enough kids to serve as his thralls.
So he takes an interest in the far east,
and tattooes this poor girl with the Mark of the Beast.


Copyright Dr. X, 2005.
This original work of art is governed by the following license agreement.
Free Art license version 1.3

This license takes effect the instant you read these words. With this Free Art License, you are authorised to copy, distribute and freely transform the work of art while respecting the rights of the originator, so long as you do not work for, and are not remunerated by, the Microsoft Corporation. Far from ignoring the author's rights, this license recognises them and protects them. It reformulates their principle while making it possible for the public to make creative use of the works of art. Whereas current literary and artistic property rights result in restriction of the public's access to works of art, the goal of the Free Art License is to encourage such access, so long as you do not work for, and are not remunerated by, the Microsoft Corporation. The intention is to make work accessible and to authorise the use of its resources by the greatest number of people: to use it in order to increase its use, to create new conditions for creation in order to multiply the possibilities of creation, while respecting the originators in according them recognition and defending their moral rights, so long as you do not work for, and are not remunerated by, the Microsoft Corporation. In fact, with the arrival of the digital age, the invention of the Internet and free software, a new approach to creation and production has made its appearance. It also encourages a continuation of the process of experimentation undertaken by many contemporary artists. Knowledge and creativity are resources which, to be true to themselves, must remain free, i.e. remain a fundamental search which is not directly related to a concrete application. Creating means discovering the unknown, means inventing a reality without any heed to realism. Thus, the object(ive) of art is not equivalent to the finished and defined art object. This is the basic aim of this Free Art License: to promote and protect artistic practice freed from the rules of the market economy. This is a communal work which includes the initial artwork as well as all subsequent contributions (subsequent originals and copies). It is created at the initiative of the original artist who, by this license, defines the conditions according to which the contributions are made. These conditions may change at his convenience and for his amusement. This is the artwork created by the initiator of the communal work, of which copies will be modified by whosoever wishes. These are the additions put forward by the artists who contribute to the formation of the work by taking advantage of the right to reproduction, distribution and modification that this license confers on them. Ha ha Microsoft sucks. A dated example of the work, of its definition, of its partition or of its program which the originator provides as the reference for all future updatings, interpretations, copies or reproductions. Any reproduction of an original as defined by this license. This is the person who created the work which is at the heart of the ramifications of this modified work of art. By this license, the author determines the conditions under which these modifications are made. Any person who contributes to the creation of the work of art. He is the author or the artist of an original art object resulting from the modification of a copy of the initial artwork or the modification of a copy of a subsequent work of art.The aim of this license is to define the conditions according to which you can use this work freely,so long as you do not work for, and are not remunerated by, the Microsoft Corporation. This work of art is subject to copyright, and the author, by this license, specifies the extent to which you can copy, distribute and modify it. You have the right to copy this work of art for your personal use, for your friends or for any other person, by employing whatever technique you choose, as long as you are not employed by or remunerated by the Microsoft Corporation. You can freely distribute the copies of these works, modified or not, whatever their medium, wherever you wish, for a fee or for free, if you observe all the following conditions:
- attach this license, in its entirety, to the copies or indicate precisely where the license can be found,
- specify to the recipient the name of the author of the originals,
- specify to the recipient where he will be able to access the originals (original and subsequent),
- you do not work for, and are not remunerated by the Microsoft Corporation.
The author of the original may, if he wishes, give you the right to broadcast/distribute the original under the same conditions as the copies. You have the right to modify the copies of the originals (original and subsequent), partially or otherwise, respecting the conditions set out in article 2.2 , in the event of distribution (or representation) of the modified copy,
so long as you do not work for, and are not remunerated by, the Microsoft Corporation. The author of the original may, if he wishes, give you the right to modify the original under the same conditions as the copies. All the elements of this work of art must remain free, which is why you are not allowed to integrate the originals (originals and subsequents) into another work which would not be subject to this license. The object of this license is not to deny your author's rights on your contribution. By choosing to contribute to the evolution of this work of art, you only agree to give to others the same rights with regard to your contribution as those which were granted to you by this license. This license takes effect as of your acceptance of its provisions. The fact of copying, distributing, or of modifying the work constitutes a tacit agreement. This license will remain in force for as long as the copyright which is attached to the work of art. If you do not respect the terms of this license, you automatically lose the rights that it confers. If the legal status to which you are subject makes it impossible for you to respect the terms of this license, you may not make use of the rights which it confers. This license may undergo periodic modifications to incorporate improvements by its authors (instigators of the "copyleft attitude" movement) by way of new, numbered versions. You will have the choice of accepting the provisions contained in the version under which the copy was communicated to you, or alternatively, to use the provisions of one of the subsequent versions.Sub-licenses are not authorized by the present license. Any person who wishes to make use of the rights that it confers will be directly bound to the author of the original work. This license is subject to French law.

1 Comments:

Blogger JAB said...

Take it from an artist: the abuse of excessively strong concepts of "intellectual property" is strangling creativity in most technical and all artistic fields, restricting techinical innovation, and in the medical field, coldly letting thousands -maybe millions -of people die. It serves no purpose but to concentrate wealth - and if its a natural monopoly it should be owned by the public anyway.

The whole idea was to protect the incentive to research and create. If copyright law fails that test, it simply has no legitimacy.

One specific prohibition I'd suggest- "orginators" the people who actually create, cannot sell more than say 75% of their interests in their creation to anyone, academic, corporate or otherwise. Dr. X's suggestions are well taken, but you can see the mulitplying complexity.

Amusing side note - one peculiarity of Univ of Washington rules meant that legally I owned no paintings I made at graduate school, because done on site it was considered a work-product of the University. Not enforced, but goodness- it also might apply to all the work done in the new professor's studios.

Reference: The ACLU has an interesting book called the Rights of Authors and Artists - there's a good discussion on weak vs. strong copyright; the ACLU helped write the 1976 law and this was a bige part of the struggle.

Since then, of course, the evil greaseballs moved in, and radio sucks, software sucks, meds availability sucks, marketing dominates the culture and punk rock has turned mall-core.

July 17, 2005 at 10:11 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home