July 28, 2005

We Have Nothing to Fear But Treatment for Fear Itself

I keep looking for evidence that new technology will not be instantly abused to its upmost extent, the moment the abuse is possible.

In this case, a suggested beta-blocker drug treatment for Post-Traumatic stress disorder, which is all very well in many ways although it works apparantly by surpressing memory, has a ghastly side potential:

Dr Paul McHugh, a psychiatrist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland and member of the US President's Council on Bioethics expressed concern over the possible uses of the drug.

"If soldiers did something that ended up with children getting killed, do you want to give them beta blockers so that they can do it again?"

Another side note - beta-blockers have become de rigeur at classical music auditions and for certain performances, reducing mistakes and artistry at the same time.

3 Comments:

Blogger VMM said...

1) What, is shooting kids the only thing that causes post-traumatic stress disorder?

2) Is he critisizing the military for treating people so that they are fit to perform their military functions? Does he think we shouldn't treat soldiers for gunshot wounds because they could have receieved them while fighting kids, thus enabling them to potentially fight kids again?

3) Beta-blockers reduce artistry: got any proof of that?

July 28, 2005 at 7:12 PM  
Blogger JAB said...

Reference for the idea that they may reduce artistry while increasing technical skill was an NYT piece from last year -

http://www.mozartinthejungle.com/work5.htm

It clearly works for many musicians - but I think the concerns are very serious, because of it's ubiquity among people without medical conditions.

July 28, 2005 at 8:47 PM  
Blogger VMM said...

I'm not trying to pick a fight here, but I read the article, and I'm not buying it. If any musicians claim that her performances got better when she stopped using beta-blockers, they couldn't find one to quote.

July 28, 2005 at 11:20 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home