March 27, 2010
Contributors
Previous Posts
- A meme is born
- How to get fired from The American Enterprise Inst...
- My Brief Moment of Madness has Passed
- The G.O.P. and Some Permutations
- I wonder why there aren't more doctors like this
- Awakening at The Georgian
- Joe Klein says it out loud
- Boxer faces serious challenge
- A little too close to home
- A Propagandistic Point About Today's Republican Pa...
3 Comments:
Generally, the right move is to obey the LEOs' orders even if you think they are in the wrong. But one judge out of three at the appellate level implied strongly that we have the right to resist an unlawful arrest. If that's true, when can we excercise that right, if not in this case?
Sort of an amusing nuance - you have the right to resist an unlawful arrest, but the determination as to whether the arrest was lawful has to be made after the arrest.
Once time travel is invented you can simply zoom ahead in time, present your case, then return to the arrest scene and present the favorable ruling to the arresting officer.
Then they'll tase you anyway.
Absolutely apalling. And if they had been in Utah, perhaps grounds for an attempted murder charge.
Awful
Post a Comment
<< Home