But...but...it was perfect!
SHOCKER: The world’s first “stock exchange for art” has gone bust artmarketmonitor.com/2013/05/19/fra… #neverwouldveguessed
— felix salmon (@felixsalmon) May 20, 2013
Fools swear they wise, wise men know they foolish
SHOCKER: The world’s first “stock exchange for art” has gone bust artmarketmonitor.com/2013/05/19/fra… #neverwouldveguessed
— felix salmon (@felixsalmon) May 20, 2013
1 Comments:
You know, as I think about, the problem with this isn't so much the idea as the lack of capitalization. The high-end art market, where this really might work, deals with multimillion dollar artworks (the Klimpt that sold a couple years ago for over 550 million, comes to mind) and famous art is often a economic destination for cash as an alternative to stocks and bonds- hence the current art boom, (a market which seems to cycle while, very generally, leading the Dow as an indicator.)
I would consider buying certificate stock in a world famous painting on a market trading in its value. Assuming it's insured against physical damage, it will never lose all of its value; it has an intrinsic worth. It seems somewhat comparable to real estate.
But to really turn it into a exchange, you're going to have to drop billions into it, easily, not millions, when a few Picassos are worth more than an entire San Francisco neighborhood. 5 million is probably the worth of the art in Steve Martin's guest bedroom.
Post a Comment
<< Home