June 08, 2011

Correia: If Only Glenn Beck Were A Cyborg

Prof. David Correia at the Univ. of New Mexico is a too rhetorical, however, he delineates here the quasi-religious obsession among some technophiles with "The Singularity, " sees strong links with the ideology of eugenics, and rips apart the assumption that so-called "Transhumanism" is democratic. 
I should add, I would grealy value an essay that made a better case. This relies too heavily on somewhat generic progressive objections - the corporate/ military industrial complex thing, while real, is too much of a stand-in. It needs much more specificity. 
It is however a reasonable introduction in linking Singularity ideologies and eugenics, and to strongly question the assumption that transhumanism is the kind of egalitarian/ individualist thinking it represents itself to be. 
I get the feeling that the Singularity ideology is an essentially fascistic ideology- with somewhat unconscious but real genocidal overtones, in the sense of  presuming that the present physical form of human beings is an unacceptable condition, which must and will inevitably be transcended.  Making the old forms, what? Tolerable? Superfluous? Sub-perfect? Sub-transhuman? At what point: disposable? At what point: intolerable? 



7 Comments:

Blogger VMM said...

I dunno, I think it's an essentially goofball ideology, mostly appealing to a secular "I want to live forever" crowd. You can draw comparisons with eugenics, but that's not the same thing as "links to," nor is it fair to say that because it can be compared to something associated with fascism that it is itself a fascist ideology. I don't think either biological science nor computer science will develop enough in the next century for there to be a convergence. I don't care how many brain scans you do, that doesn't mean you understand how the brain works, let alone cells. In the meantime, we're still trying to get software not to crash.

June 8, 2011 at 5:57 PM  
Blogger VMM said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

June 8, 2011 at 6:26 PM  
Blogger VMM said...

Also: cf. Looker, and tell me if killing the models made any sense.

June 8, 2011 at 6:30 PM  
Blogger JAB said...

I will certainly be more worried about these possibilities when I can reliably write two paragraphs on Facebook and have it successfully post.

June 8, 2011 at 8:35 PM  
Blogger VMM said...

I heard there are a couple of glitches like that you'll hit while it's constructing your FaceBot replacement module.

June 8, 2011 at 8:38 PM  
Blogger The Other Front said...

So...the Simulation Hypothesis posits that we are brains in jars.

Of course, we don't believe we're brains in jars, all our experience tells us we are living, breathing, fully integrated human beings.

Some of whom dearly wish they could be brains in jars.

And if they succeed, they'll be brains in jars who think they are people who created an incredible technology that turned them into brains in jars. But they'll only know about the one jar, not the other one.

June 8, 2011 at 9:57 PM  
Blogger The Sum of All Monkeys said...

This tidbit nicely sums up my opinion on the singularity and futurists in general.

June 13, 2011 at 12:20 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home